Elsevier

Auris Nasus Larynx

Volume 43, Issue 3, June 2016, Pages 217-228
Auris Nasus Larynx

Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.10.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The methods to evaluate the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person are fitting tests. The tests include those presently carried out for evaluating hearing aid fitting, and the methods of testing and evaluation have been published as “Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)” by the Japan Audiological Society.

Methods

Guidelines for the following 8 test methods are presented. (1) Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores; (2) Assessment of hearing aid fitting from the aspect of tolerance of environmental noise; (3) Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum); (4) Measurement of the hearing threshold level and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone; (5) Aided threshold test in a sound field (functional gain measurement); (6) Prediction of insertion gain and aided threshold from hearing aid characteristics and the pure tone audiogram; (7) Measurement of speech recognition in noise; (8) Assessment of hearing aid fitting using questionnaires. In the above tests, (1) and (2) are mandatory tests, and (3) to (8) are informative tests.

Results

By performing test combinations properly selected from the above 8 tests, the benefits of a hearing aid could be determined.

Conclusion

The above test methods were useful and valuable in determining the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person during clinical practice.

Introduction

There are various selection of hearing aids and hearing-aid adjustments. The method to evaluate the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person is the fitting test. The Japan Audiological Society has selected test methods whose usefulness and value were determined during clinical practice. The tests include those presently carried out for evaluating hearing aid fitting, and the methods of testing and evaluation have been published as “Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)”. The aim of these tests is for minimum better fitting of hearing aids.

In these guidelines, test items are selected among those fulfilling the following conditions: test items with (1) obvious decision criteria; (2) the possibility to perform necessary and sufficient evaluation; (3) determined test standards; (4) a reasonable test time; and (5) tests designed for adults.

In this document, guidelines for the following 8 test methods are presented.

  • (1)

    Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores.

  • (2)

    Assessment of hearing aid fitting from the aspect of tolerance of environmental noise.

  • (3)

    Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum).

  • (4)

    Measurement of the hearing threshold level and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone.

  • (5)

    Aided threshold test in a sound field (functional gain measurement).

  • (6)

    Prediction of insertion gain and aided threshold from hearing aid characteristics and the pure tone audiogram.

  • (7)

    Measurement of speech recognition in noise.

  • (8)

    Assessment of hearing aid fitting using questionnaires.

By performing test combinations properly selected from the above 8 tests, the benefits of a hearing aid can be determined. In the above tests, (1) and (2) are mandatory tests, and (3) to (8) are informative tests. (1) and (2) are mandatory because the primary purpose of hearing aid fitting is to improve speech understanding and the major cause of rejection to wear a hearing aid is intolerance to noise.

Section snippets

Test room

Assuming that hearing aid fitting tests in a sound field are performed in general otolaryngology clinics, the following conditions should be considered:

  • (1)

    The ambient noise level should not influence the test result.

  • (2)

    Reverberation of a test sound should not influence the measurement.

  • (3)

    There should be no mental pressure influencing the decision of the test subject.

Specifically, it is desirable that the ambient noise level (LA) of the test room should not exceed 50 dB. The test room should be treated to

Required tests

Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions or speech recognition scores are very important test items to judge whether a person with hearing loss can utilize hearing aids effectively. Assessment that hearing aid users can accept environmental noise is also an important test item to judge whether a person with hearing loss can use hearing aids in daily life. These two test items should be performed whenever a hearing aid is adjusted.

Informative tests

The following tests are useful to evaluate the fitting of a hearing aid, although not necessary to test every time after its adjustment. As the following tests in Sections 4.1 Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum), 4.1.1 Test equipment, 4.1.2 Test method, 4.1.3 Evaluation, 4.2 Measurement of the hearing threshold and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone, 4.2.1 Examination equipment,

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.

Acknowledgements

The present guidelines were made by the members of the Committee on Welfare and Medical Treatment of the Japan Audiological Society.

References (14)

  • ISO 389-7: Acoustics – Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment – Part 7: Reference threshold of hearing under the free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions

    (2005)
  • ANSI S3.6: Specification for audiometers

    (2004)
  • R. Inoue et al.

    Sound field speech recognition thresholds for 67-S speech audiometric test lists in quiet and noise

    Audiol Japan

    (2002)
  • P. Lyregaard

    Towards a theory of speech audiometry tests

  • K. Kodera

    Improvement of speech recognition by hearing aids

    Development of hearing aids and its application in society

    (2006)
  • K. Kodera

    Evaluation of the effects by a hearing aid

    Way of thinking of the hearing aid fitting

    (2010)
  • E. Hirota et al.

    Application of speech discrimination test for the fitting of hearing aids

    Audiol Japan

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • Investigation of the current supply system for hearing aids at stores in Japan

    2023, Auris Nasus Larynx
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ueno et al. found that almost all hearing aid wearers who were dissatisfied with the effectiveness of their hearing aids wore them with insufficient gain [18]. For the subjective evaluation methods, the highest percentage of stores used a verbal question method, but the Assessment of Hearing Before and After Wearing Hearing Aids questionnaire [9] was used relatively frequently in 385 (37.3%) stores. Finally, our findings have implications for the current status of a speech-language-hearing therapist who sells hearing aids.

  • Relationship between cognitive domains and hearing ability in memory clinic patients: How did the relationship change after 6 months of introducing a hearing aid?

    2023, Auris Nasus Larynx
    Citation Excerpt :

    The severity of dementia is considered moderate or high if the total MMSE score is ≤20 points [28]. Because a speech intelligibility of <60% is one of the indicators of severe hearing and speech difficulty, according to the “Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010) by the Japan Audiological Society” [29], the ability to hear speech is considered to be preserved if the speech intelligibility score is ≥70%. Participants with a low MMSE total score did not necessarily have a low BE score.

  • Comparison of speech perception lists used to evaluate Japanese single syllable hearing

    2022, Auris Nasus Larynx
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, this was the result for CI users. For hearing aids, along with the speech perception test, the intelligence curve is important information [17]. Therefore, the evaluation performed using only one sound pressure does not seem to apply to other hearing implants, such as middle ear implants and bone conduction devices.

  • Effective sound therapy using a hearing aid and educational counseling in patients with chronic tinnitus

    2021, Auris Nasus Larynx
    Citation Excerpt :

    The choice of the ear which used the hearing aid (one ear or both ears) was determined by the patient's intention. All patients met the criteria for speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores, as well as functional gain measurement, as specified in the guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting [18]. These findings indicated that their hearing aids were well adjusted.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text