Abstract
We developed treatment guidelines (TGs) for appropriate transitional care of the genitourinary system in patients with persistent cloaca (PC), cloacal exstrophy (CE), or Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Häuser syndrome (MRKH). These TGs are in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds), published in 2014 in Japan. Clinical questions (CQs) concerning treatment outcomes of the genitourinary system, pregnancy and delivery, and quality of life in adulthood were prepared as six themes for PC and CE and five themes for MRKH. We were able to publish statements on chronic renal dysfunction, hydrometrocolpos, and pregnancy, based on four CQs about PC, four about CE, and two about MRKH, respectively. However, due to the paucity of proper manuscripts, we were unable to make conclusions about the correct timing and method of vaginoplasty for patients with PC, CE, and MRKH or the usefulness of early bladder closure for patients with CE. These TGs may help clarify the current treatments for PC, CE, and MRKH in childhood, which have been carried out on an institutional basis. To improve clinical outcomes, systematic clinical trials revealing comprehensive clinical data of the urinary and reproductive systems, especially the length of the common channel in PC, are essential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kubota M. The current profile of persistent cloaca and cloacal exstrophy in Japan: the results of a nationwide survey in 2014 and a review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(4):505–12.
Santulli TV. The treatment of imperforate anus and associated fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1952;95(5):601–14.
Trusler GA, Wilkinson RH. Imperforate anus: a review of 147 cases. Can J Surg. 1962;5:269–77.
Pena A. Posterior sagittal approach for the correction of anorectal malformations. Adv Surg. 1986;19:69–100.
Tainaka T, Uchida H, Tanaka Y, Hinoki A, Shirota C, Sumida W, et al. Long-term outcomes and complications after laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high- and intermediate-type anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(10):1111–5.
Ardelean MA, Bauer J, Schimke C, Ludwikowski B, Schimpl G. Improvement of continence with reoperation in selected patients after surgery for anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):112–8.
Warne SA, Wilcox DT, Creighton S, Ransley PG. Long-term gynecological outcome of patients with persistent cloaca. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Pt 2):1493–6.
Warne SA, Wilcox DT, Ledermann SE, Ransley PG. Renal outcome in patients with cloaca. J Urol. 2002;167(6):2548–51 (discussion 51).
Warne SA, Wilcox DT, Ransley PG. Long-term urological outcome of patients presenting with persistent cloaca. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 2):1859–62 (discussion 62).
Vliet R, Roelofs LA, Rassouli-Kirchmeier R, de Gier RP, Claahsen-van der Grinten HL, Verhaak C, et al. Clinical outcome of cloacal exstrophy, current status, and a change in surgical management. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2015;25(1):87–93.
Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC, Cheng E, Yerkes E, Reynolds M. Fate of the uterus in 46XX cloacal exstrophy patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(10):2043–6.
Lund DP, Hendren WH. Cloacal exstrophy: a 25-year experience with 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):68–75.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 728 Summary: Müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):196–7.
Ledig S, Wieacker P. Clinical and genetic aspects of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Med Genet. 2018;30(1):3–11.
Mallmann MR, Reutter H, Mack-Detlefsen B, Gottschalk I, Geipel A, Berg C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of hydro(metro)colpos: a series of 20 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45:62–8.
Verma R, Shah R, Anand S, Vaja C, Gaikwad K. Mayer–Rockitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome presenting as irreducible inguinal hernia. Indian J Surg. 2018;80(1):93–5.
Cheikhelard A, Bidet M, Baptiste A, Viaud M, Fagot C, Khen-Dunlop N, et al. Surgery is not superior to dilation for the management of vaginal agenesis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: a multicenter comparative observational study in 131 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(3):281 e1–e9.
Mimura T, Kondo Y, Ohta A, Iwamoto M, Ota A, Okamoto N, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for adult Still’s disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28:736–57.
Fukui T, Yamaguchi N, Morizane T, Yoshida M, Kojimahara N. Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) the guidance for development of clinical practice guideline 2014. Igakushoin: Tokyo; 2014 (in Japanese).
Research Team for the establishment of treatment guidelines for persistent cloaca, cloacal exstrophy and Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Häuser syndrome for the proper transitional care of the patients. Treatment guideline for smooth transitional care of persistent cloaca, cloacal exstrophy and Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Tokyo: Medical View; 2017 (in Japanese).
DeFoor WR, Bischoff A, Reddy P, VanderBrink B, Minevich E, Schulte M, et al. Chronic kidney disease stage progression in patients undergoing repair of persistent cloaca. J Urol. 2015;194(1):190–4.
Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Breech L, Louden E, Pena A. Hydrocolpos in cloacal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(6):1241–5.
Versteegh HP, Sloots CE, Wolffenbuttel KP, de Jong JR, Sleeboom C, Feitz WF, et al. Urogenital function after cloacal reconstruction, two techniques evaluated. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(6):1160–4.
Versteegh HP, van Rooij IA, Levitt MA, Sloots CE, Wijnen RM, de Blaauw I. Long-term follow-up of functional outcome in patients with a cloacal malformation: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(11):2343–50.
Levitt MA, Stein DM, Pena A. Gynecologic concerns in the treatment of teenagers with cloaca. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(2):188–93.
Taghizadeh AK, Wilcox DT. A posterior sagittal approach for revision vaginoplasty. BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1115–7.
Couchman A, Creighton SM, Wood D. Adolescent and adult outcomes in women following childhood vaginal reconstruction for cloacal anomaly. J Urol. 2015;193(5 Suppl):1819–22.
Pena A, Levitt MA, Hong A, Midulla P. Surgical management of cloacal malformations: a review of 339 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):470–9 (discussion 9).
Matsui F, Shimada K, Matsumoto F, Obara T, Kubota A. Bladder function after total urogenital mobilization for persistent cloaca. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2455–9.
Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Breech L, Hall J, Pena A. Vaginal switch—a useful technical alternative to vaginal replacement for select cases of cloaca and urogenital sinus. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(2):363–6.
Breech L. Gynecologic concerns in patients with anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(2):139–45.
Greenberg JA, Hendren WH. Vaginal delivery after cloacal malformation repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(4 Pt 2):666–7.
Sato Y, Murakami T, Kadowaki M, Konno R, Yoshida S, Okamura K. A remnant tubal pregnancy after cloacal malformation repair. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):440–1.
Greenberg JA, Wu JM, Rein MS, Hendren WH. Triplets after cloacal malformation repair. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003;16(1):43–4.
Shrim A, Podymow T, Breech L, Dahan MH. Term delivery after in vitro fertilization in a patient with cloacal malformation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(9):952–4.
Salvi N, Arthur I. A case of successful pregnancy outcome in a patient born with cloacal malformation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(3):343–5.
Ogasawara Y, Okazaki T, Yamataka A. Long-term follow-up of persistent cloaca. Shonigeka. 2007;39:1192–5 (in Japanese).
Iwamura Y, Aoyama K, Goto T, Akiyama T, Takao T, Nakahara Y, et al. Long-term follow-up of the patients with persistent cloaca in view point of sexual function. Shounigeka. 2006;38:994–8 (in Japanese).
Shimada K, Matsumoto F, Tohda A, Ainoya K. Urinary control after the definitive reconstruction of cloacal anomaly. Int J Urol. 2005;12(7):631–6.
Reiner WG, Gearhart JP. Discordant sexual identity in some genetic males with cloacal exstrophy assigned to female sex at birth. N Engl Med. 2004;350(4):333–41.
Reiner WG. Gender identity and sex-of-rearing in children with disorders of sexual differentiation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18(6):549–53.
Mukherjee B, McCauley E, Hanford RB, Aalsma M, Anderson AM. Psychopathology, psychosocial, gender and cognitive outcomes in patients with cloacal exstrophy. J Urol. 2007;178(2):630–5 (discussion 4–5).
Diamond DA, Burns JP, Huang L, Rosoklija I, Retik AB. Gender assignment for newborns with 46XY cloacal exstrophy: a 6-year followup survey of pediatric urologists. J Urol. 2011;186(4 Suppl):1642–8.
Husmann DA, Vandersteen DR, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. Urinary continence after staged bladder reconstruction for cloacal exstrophy: the effect of coexisting neurological abnormalities on urinary continence. J Urol. 1999;161(5):1598–602.
Shah BB, Di Carlo H, Goldstein SD, Pierorazio PM, Inouye BM, Massanyi EZ, et al. Initial bladder closure of the cloacal exstrophy complex: outcome related risk factors and keys to success. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(6):1036–9 (discussion 9–40).
Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Pope JC, Adams MC, Brock JW 3rd. First stage approximation of the exstrophic bladder in patients with cloacal exstrophy—should this be the initial surgical approach in all patients? J Urol. 2007;178(4):1632–5 (discussion 5–6).
Phillips TM, Salmasi AH, Stec A, Novak TE, Gearhart JP, Mathews RI. Urological outcomes in the omphalocele exstrophy imperforate anus spinal defects (OEIS) complex: experience with 80 patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(3):353–8.
Hisamatsu E, Nakagawa Y, Sugita Y. Vaginal reconstruction in female cloacal exstrophy patients. Urology. 2014;84(3):681–4.
Massanyi EZ, Gupta A, Goel S, Gearhart JP, Burnett AL, Bivalacqua TJ, et al. Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty for penile inadequacy in patients with exstrophy. J Urol. 2013;190(4 Suppl):1577–82.
Husmann DA, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. Phallic reconstruction in cloacal exstrophy. J Urol. 1989;142(2 Pt 2):563–4 (discussion 72).
Mathews RI, Gan M, Gearhart JP. Urogynaecological and obstetric issues in women with the exstrophy–epispadias complex. BJU Int. 2003;91(9):845–9.
Gezer A, Guralp O, Yesilbas C, Madazli R. Spontaneous pregnancy and birth with corrected cloacal exstrophy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(4):413–4.
Lermann J, Mueller A, Wiesinger E, Haberle L, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, et al. Comparison of different diagnostic procedures for the staging of malformations associated with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):156–9.
Pompili G, Munari A, Franceschelli G, Flor N, Meroni R, Frontino G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Radiol Med. 2009;114(5):811–26.
Levitt MA, Stein DM, Pena A. Rectovestibular fistula with absent vagina: a unique anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(7):986–9 (discussion 90).
Levitt MA, Bischoff A, Breech L, Pena A. Rectovestibular fistula—rarely recognized associated gynecologic anomalies. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(6):1261–7 (discussion 7).
Lima M, Ruggeri G, Randi B, Domini M, Gargano T, La Pergola E, et al. Vaginal replacement in the pediatric age group: a 34-year experience of intestinal vaginoplasty in children and young girls. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(10):2087–91.
Ruggeri G, Gargano T, Antonellini C, Carlini V, Randi B, Destro F, et al. Vaginal malformations: a proposed classification based on embryological, anatomical and clinical criteria and their surgical management (an analysis of 167 cases). Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(8):797–803.
Wester T, Tovar JA, Rintala RJ. Vaginal agenesis or distal vaginal atresia associated with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(3):571–6.
Will MA, Marsh CA, Smorgick N, Smith YR, Quint EH. Surgical pearls: laparoscopic removal of uterine remnants in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(4):224–7.
Marsh CA, Will MA, Smorgick N, Quint EH, Hussain H, Smith YR. Uterine remnants and pelvic pain in females with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(3):199–202.
Raudrant D, Chalouhi G, Dubuisson J, Golfier F. Laparoscopic uterovaginal anastomosis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome with functioning horn. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(6):2416–8.
Erman Akar M, Ozekinci M, Alper O, Demir D, Cevikol C, Meric Bilekdemir A, et al. Assessment of women who applied for the uterine transplant project as potential candidates for uterus transplantation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(1):12–6.
Troncon JK, Zani AC, Vieira AD, Poli-Neto OB, Nogueira AA, Rosa ESJC. Endometriosis in a patient with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:376231.
Liao LM, Conway GS, Ismail-Pratt I, Bikoo M, Creighton SM. Emotional and sexual wellness and quality of life in women with Rokitansky syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(2):117.e1–6.
Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, Bizic MR, Stojanovic BZ, Cavic TM. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Sex Health. 2011;8(3):427–30.
Fliegner M, Krupp K, Brunner F, Rall K, Brucker SY, Briken P, et al. Sexual life and sexual wellness in individuals with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser Syndrome (MRKHS). J Sex Med. 2014;11(3):729–42.
Communal PH, Chevret-Measson M, Golfier F, Raudrant D. Sexuality after sigmoid colpopoiesis in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):600–6.
Bean EJ, Mazur T, Robinson AD. Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: sexuality, psychological effects, and quality of life. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22(6):339–46.
Weijenborg PT, ter Kuile MM. The effect of a group programme on women with the Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. BJOG. 2000;107(3):365–8.
Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention versus waiting-list control for women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: MRKH). Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2296–301.
Raziel A, Friedler S, Gidoni Y, Ben Ami I, Strassburger D, Ron-El R. Surrogate in vitro fertilization outcome in typical and atypical forms of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):126–30.
Beski S, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL, Edmonds K. Gestational surrogacy: a feasible option for patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(11):2326–8.
Batzer FR, Corson SL, Gocial B, Daly DC, Go K, English ME. Genetic offspring in patients with vaginal agenesis: specific medical and legal issues. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(5):1288–92.
Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Bokstrom H, Kvarnstrom N, Molne J, Dahm-Kahler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):607–16.
Endo M, Hayashi A, Ishihara M, Maie M, Nagasaki A, Nishi T, et al. Analysis of 1,992 patients with anorectal malformations over the past two decades in Japan. Steering Committee of Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(3):435–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Masayuki Kubota and his co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The present TGs were published in Japanese in book format in March 2017 [20].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kubota, M., Osuga, Y., Kato, K. et al. Treatment guidelines for persistent cloaca, cloacal exstrophy, and Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Häuser syndrome for the appropriate transitional care of patients. Surg Today 49, 985–1002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01810-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01810-z