Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for systemic treatment of breast cancer

Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Mamounas E, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):1993–2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Houghton J, George WD, Cuzick J, Duggan C, Fentiman IS, Spittle M, UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research, Ductal Carcinoma in situ Working Party, DCIS Trialists in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362 (9378):95–102.

  3. Staley H, McCallum I, Bruce J. Postoperative tamoxifen for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD007847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noguchi S, Koyama H, Uchino J, Abe R, Miura S, Sugimachi K, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen, tegafur plus uracil, or both in women with node-negative breast cancer: a pooled analysis of six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2172–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park Y, Okamura K, Mitsuyama S, Saito T, Koh J, Kyono S, et al. Uracil–tegafur and tamoxifen vs cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen in post-operative adjuvant therapy for stage I, II, or III A lymph node-positive breast cancer: a comparative study. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(4):598–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe T, Sano M, Takashima S, Kitaya T, Tokuda Y, Yoshimoto M, et al. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohashi Y, Watanabe T, Sano M, Koyama H, Inaji H, Suzuki T. Efficacy of oral tegafur–uracil (UFT) as adjuvant therapy as compared with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials (N.SAS-BC 01 trial and CUBC trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;119(3):633–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Theodoulou M, Mauer AM, Kornblith AB, et al. CALGB investigators. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(20):2055–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fossati R, Confalonieri C, Torri V, Ghislandi E, Penna A, Pistotti V, et al. Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(10):3439–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghersi D, Wilcken N, Simes RJ. A systematic review of taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(3):293–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, Ingle JN, Martino S, Rowinsky EK, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(4):588–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Shaughnessy JA, Kaufmann M, Siedentopf F, Dalivoust P, Debled M, Robert NJ, et al. capecitabine monotherapy: review of studies in first-line HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17:476–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L, Cameron D, Cufer T, Fallowfield L, et al. 1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1). Breast. 2012;21:242–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goetz MP, Rae JM, Suman VJ, Safgren SL, Ames MM, Visscher DW, Reynolds C, Couch FJ, Lingle WL, Flockhart DA, Desta Z, Perez EA, Ingle JN. Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(36):9312–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim HS, Ju Lee H, Seok Lee K, Sook Lee E, Jang IJ, Ro J. Clinical implications of CYP2D6 genotypes predictive of tamoxifen pharmacokinetics in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3837–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Imamura CK, Hosono N, Tsunoda T, Kubo M, Tanigawara Y, Flockhart DA, Desta Z, Skaar TC, Aki F, Hirata K, Takatsuka Y, Okazaki M, Ohsumi S, Yamakawa T, Sasa M, Nakamura Y, Zembutsu H. Significant effect of polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and ABCC2 on clinical outcomes of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1287–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dezentje VO, van Schaik RH, Vletter-Bogaartz JM, van der Straaten T, Wessels JA, Kranenbarg EM, Berns EM, Seynaeve C, Putter H, van de Velde CJ, Nortier JW, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. CYP2D6 genotype in relation to tamoxifen efficacy in a Dutch cohort of the tamoxifen exemestane adjuvant multinational (TEAM) trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(2):363–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rae JM, Drury S, Hayes DF, Stearns V, Thibert JN, Haynes BP, Salter J, Sestak I, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Trialists A. CYP2D6 and UGT2B7 genotype and risk of recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(6):452–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M, Pagani O, Tang W, Kammler R, Dell’orto P, Biasi MO, Thurlimann B, Lyng MB, Ditzel HJ, Neven P, Debled M, Maibach R, Price KN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Rae JM, Viale G. CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1–98 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(6):441–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V, Ward B, Ho H, Lee KH, Skaar T, Storniolo AM, Li L, Araba A, Blanchard R, Nguyen A, Ullmer L, Hayden J, Lemler S, Weinshilboum RM, Rae JM, Hayes DF, Flockhart DA. CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

H. Mukai received a research grant from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Eisai Co., Ltd, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi K.K.; N. Yamamoto received a research grant from Pfizer Inc., Bayer and Puma; the other authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirofumi Mukai.

Additional information

This article is an English digested edition of the Nyugan Shinryo guideline 2013 nen ban, published by Kanehara & Co., LTD.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukai, H., Aihara, T., Yamamoto, Y. et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for systemic treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 22, 5–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0563-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0563-x

Keywords

Navigation