Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)
Introduction
There are various selection of hearing aids and hearing-aid adjustments. The method to evaluate the efficacy of the adjusted hearing aid for a hearing-impaired person is the fitting test. The Japan Audiological Society has selected test methods whose usefulness and value were determined during clinical practice. The tests include those presently carried out for evaluating hearing aid fitting, and the methods of testing and evaluation have been published as “Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)”. The aim of these tests is for minimum better fitting of hearing aids.
In these guidelines, test items are selected among those fulfilling the following conditions: test items with (1) obvious decision criteria; (2) the possibility to perform necessary and sufficient evaluation; (3) determined test standards; (4) a reasonable test time; and (5) tests designed for adults.
In this document, guidelines for the following 8 test methods are presented.
- (1)
Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions and speech recognition scores.
- (2)
Assessment of hearing aid fitting from the aspect of tolerance of environmental noise.
- (3)
Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum).
- (4)
Measurement of the hearing threshold level and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone.
- (5)
Aided threshold test in a sound field (functional gain measurement).
- (6)
Prediction of insertion gain and aided threshold from hearing aid characteristics and the pure tone audiogram.
- (7)
Measurement of speech recognition in noise.
- (8)
Assessment of hearing aid fitting using questionnaires.
By performing test combinations properly selected from the above 8 tests, the benefits of a hearing aid can be determined. In the above tests, (1) and (2) are mandatory tests, and (3) to (8) are informative tests. (1) and (2) are mandatory because the primary purpose of hearing aid fitting is to improve speech understanding and the major cause of rejection to wear a hearing aid is intolerance to noise.
Section snippets
Test room
Assuming that hearing aid fitting tests in a sound field are performed in general otolaryngology clinics, the following conditions should be considered:
- (1)
The ambient noise level should not influence the test result.
- (2)
Reverberation of a test sound should not influence the measurement.
- (3)
There should be no mental pressure influencing the decision of the test subject.
Required tests
Measurements of speech performance-intensity functions or speech recognition scores are very important test items to judge whether a person with hearing loss can utilize hearing aids effectively. Assessment that hearing aid users can accept environmental noise is also an important test item to judge whether a person with hearing loss can use hearing aids in daily life. These two test items should be performed whenever a hearing aid is adjusted.
Informative tests
The following tests are useful to evaluate the fitting of a hearing aid, although not necessary to test every time after its adjustment. As the following tests in Sections 4.1 Measurement of real-ear insertion gain (measurement of sound pressure levels at the eardrum), 4.1.1 Test equipment, 4.1.2 Test method, 4.1.3 Evaluation, 4.2 Measurement of the hearing threshold and the uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) in sound pressure level (SPL) with an inserted earphone, 4.2.1 Examination equipment,
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.
Acknowledgements
The present guidelines were made by the members of the Committee on Welfare and Medical Treatment of the Japan Audiological Society.
References (14)
ISO 389-7: Acoustics – Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment – Part 7: Reference threshold of hearing under the free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions
(2005)ANSI S3.6: Specification for audiometers
(2004)- et al.
Sound field speech recognition thresholds for 67-S speech audiometric test lists in quiet and noise
Audiol Japan
(2002) Towards a theory of speech audiometry tests
Improvement of speech recognition by hearing aids
Development of hearing aids and its application in society
(2006)Evaluation of the effects by a hearing aid
Way of thinking of the hearing aid fitting
(2010)- et al.
Application of speech discrimination test for the fitting of hearing aids
Audiol Japan
(1988)
Cited by (22)
Investigation of the current supply system for hearing aids at stores in Japan
2023, Auris Nasus LarynxCitation Excerpt :Ueno et al. found that almost all hearing aid wearers who were dissatisfied with the effectiveness of their hearing aids wore them with insufficient gain [18]. For the subjective evaluation methods, the highest percentage of stores used a verbal question method, but the Assessment of Hearing Before and After Wearing Hearing Aids questionnaire [9] was used relatively frequently in 385 (37.3%) stores. Finally, our findings have implications for the current status of a speech-language-hearing therapist who sells hearing aids.
Relationship between cognitive domains and hearing ability in memory clinic patients: How did the relationship change after 6 months of introducing a hearing aid?
2023, Auris Nasus LarynxCitation Excerpt :The severity of dementia is considered moderate or high if the total MMSE score is ≤20 points [28]. Because a speech intelligibility of <60% is one of the indicators of severe hearing and speech difficulty, according to the “Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010) by the Japan Audiological Society” [29], the ability to hear speech is considered to be preserved if the speech intelligibility score is ≥70%. Participants with a low MMSE total score did not necessarily have a low BE score.
Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram
2023, Auris Nasus LarynxCitation Excerpt :After the first one-year follow up, the patients continued to undergo an annual assessment. In the present study, all the hearing aids were adjusted to meet the following criteria: 1) functional gain of about one-half of the hearing threshold; and 2) an aided threshold of 35 dB HL at 1000 Hz as required by the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan guidelines [9]. Audiological examinations were carried out in a soundproof room using an AA-84 audiometer (RION, Tokyo, Japan) in accordance with the Japan Audiological Society guidelines.
Anticipating real-ear insertion response using an external auditory canal model
2022, Auris Nasus LarynxComparison of speech perception lists used to evaluate Japanese single syllable hearing
2022, Auris Nasus LarynxCitation Excerpt :However, as mentioned earlier, the 67S and 57S tests were normally run at several consecutive sound pressures. The results obtained were evaluated by drawing an intelligibility curve in addition to the speech perception score [17]. In this regard, we have previously reported that sound pressures of 40–70 dBHL do not affect the speech perception score [9].